Let’s consider a property development scenario to illustrate the benefits of mezzanine finance.
Imagine a property developer with a project requiring $10,000,000 for construction costs. In a traditional senior debt setup, the developer secures an $8,000,000 senior facility and contributes $2,000,000 in equity. With a senior debt structure, the interest expense is $500,000.
Now, let’s compare this with a senior and mezzanine debt facility. In this case, the senior facility remains at $8,000,000, but the developer adds a $1,000,000 mezzanine debt facility to bridge the gap. The equity contribution reduces to $1,000,000. With the mezzanine debt structure, the interest expense increases to $700,000.
In this example, the total project costs under the mezzanine debt structure are slightly higher at $10,700,000 compared to $10,500,000 with traditional senior debt. While the developer’s profit is reduced by $200,000 from 24% to 22% of costs, the project can be completed without dipping into existing equity or taking on joint venture partners.
|
Traditional senior debt |
Senior debt + Mezzanine finance |
Sales |
$13,000,000 |
$13,000,000 |
Construction costs |
$10,000,000 |
$10,000,000 |
Senior debt facility |
$8,000,000 |
$8,000,000 |
Mezzanine debt facility |
$0 |
$1,000,000 |
Equity contribution |
$2,000,000 |
$1,000,000 |
Interest component – Senior debt |
$500,000 |
$500,000 |
Interest component – Mezzanine debt |
$0 |
$200,000 |
Total interest expense |
$500,000 |
$700,000 |
Total costs |
$10,500,000 |
$10,700,000 |
Profit |
$2,500,000 |
$2,300,000 |
Profit % of costs |
24% |
22% |
Profit % of equity |
125% |
230% |